 |
| year: 2005 rating: **** |
HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE: The
best so far of the Potter films. Unlike parts two and three, it
doesn’t seek an 11th hour plot while divulging exposition about things
happening or about to happen or what could be happening till it’s
happening, but there’s an interesting mainline throughout: the Tri-Wizard
Tournament, consisting of three students from various locations, and at
first – since the starting age is seventeen – this
doesn’t
include Harry Potter.
Until the Goblet of Fire, which spouts out the
selected contestants, chooses the fourteen-year-old. The rest of the
film consists of Harry surviving three dangerous tasks including
fighting a dragon; staying underwater for an hour against some
nasty-looking mermaids; and running through a mysterious hedge maze
(without Jack Nicholson wielding an ax).
While Hagrid is thrust into a
silly romance, Harry’s burly mentor role is taken over by Brenden
Gleeson as Alastor “Mad Eye" Moody, a former bounty hunter type who’s a
formidable, but ultimately resourceful, new teacher at the school.
The
mentoring between Mad Eye and Harry takes most of the peripheral from
even the faithful sidekicks Ron Weasley, who whines and squeaks
his way through another outing, and Hermione, seeming even more uptight
(and thus, intense) than ever.
But the real significance is the
introduction of Valdemort himself (Ralph Fiennes) – appearing after
Harry plummets from the final maze into a fog shrouded cemetery, thus
witnessing his vile aggressor’s ominous, stage-like diatribe perhaps a
bit too lengthy… Then again, since previously appearing in various
shapes and sizes with little to say, he has plenty of time to make up
for.
GOBLET also includes the death of a side-character and ends with our
heroes glancing into an unclear future that, with a tangible evil now
placed in the forefront, is of much greater risk and significance.
 |
| year: 2007 rating: ** |
HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX: "Hermione,"
Harry says at one point, "it's not that simple." An understatement!
Well the film starts pretty good with an attack by those vicious Death
Eaters... in the suburbs. Then we learn Harry's been expelled for
practicing magic in the presence of a Muggle. It's here, through a
courtroom scene as our put-upon hero faces expulsion, we're introduced
to the Order of the Phoenix, a fascist group of tyrannical political
types wanting to turn Hogwarts into their own structured school, and not
believing that Voldemort has returned.
But old Stocking Face isn't the
main antagonist here. An uptight and darkly efficient underling of the
Order's chief, Delores Umbridge, prancing like a finicky church lady
born from the depths of hell, takes that position.
With a snide giggle
and a heart of stone, Umbridge attempts to keep Harry and friends from
forming a secret student army against Voldemort, which is a more
involving premise than it turns out to be.
There's a montage of the
young wizards training, but nothing really comes of it. All leading to
the climax taking place in the maze-like "Department of Mysteries,"
visually resembling a music video more than an important battle... And the
very end, within one conversation, Harry learns from Dumbledore what
could have been stated in the beginning of the next film, making this
not only bland, boring, and much too complicated, but a waste of time.
 |
| year: 2009 rating: ***1/2 |
HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE: Edgy
darkness abounds as the Harry Potter series nears an end, and we learn
the ways to finally rid of Voldemort (for the last two films) and it
probably won’t be easy.
The cinematography is liken to a fantasy
rendition of THE GODFATHER, cast in darkness and shadows, murky moods
permeating a suspenseful, cerebral odyssey.
Harry has become a pop icon
of sorts, and before he can hook up with a beautiful "Muggle" groupie,
he’s taken by good old Dumbledore to meet our newest special guest: Jim
Broadbent as a reclusive Professor Slughorn, holding key memories of
former Hogwarts student Tom Riddle.
The entire film plays like a moody
mystery/thriller, spending little time with spells, games and
camaraderie between the kids: although there’s some light shed on Ron
Weasley, who’s unintentionally stolen the hearts of both a love-struck
chippie and his good pal Hermione.
But the entire movie truly belongs to
Harry: dogging the heels of Slughorn and a grownup Malfoy: the latter
in-cahoots with the Dark Lord. And while the third act’s finale is more
flash than substance, we finally experience Dumbledore and Harry banding
together, reminiscent of Bilbo and Gandalf in J.R.R. Tolkien’s THE
HOBBIT.
This, the beginning of the end, is a successful bridge leading
to an unknown future.
 |
| year: 2010 rating: *1/2 |
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 1: These are dark times, and this is pretty dark film, the first of two parts wrapping up the Harry Potter series. And gone is the safety of Hogwarts as Harry seeks those essential elements to takes pieces out of Voldemort soul – and most of the film is setting up for the next, and last, adventure…
There are only a few good action scenes, and the characters spout so much exposition you’ll need a court typist to dictate everything...
The very beginning loses a couple important characters in a flying broom attack so hard to see, a lot of the punch is lost. Add a lot of whining by a jealous Ron, as Harry and Hermione discover a subliminal love on a long journey through a seemingly endless desert.
The best scene involves a story told by Hermione, reading from BEEDLE THE BARD, a book left to her from Dumbledore: the story is shown in a fantastically gloomy animation (much like Lucy Lieu’s backstory in KILL BILL) – here we learn about the Elder wand and of course, the Deathly Hallows, encompassing three items that, when combined, will mean the end of Harry and just about everything.
And although Harry takes the death of Dobble, the Elfin Jar Jar Binks, very seriously, this reviewer felt a gigantic sigh of relief upon the horrendously annoying creature’s demise… Thankfully, part 2 peels away all the superfluous junk and thins down into a neat plot: a light a the end of the tunnel, though still quite a long tunnel…
 |
| year: 2011 rating: *** |
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 2: The three main characters are in search of the last “horcrux” to finally get rid of Voldemort… But with everything else aside, if there is any kind of noticeable arc throughout the series, it’s how much Daniel Radcliffe grew as an actor: in the first film, Emma Watson’s Hermione stole the show while the two boys, though natural, seemed a bit overwhelmed… Yet this point Radcliffe delivers lines like a stage actor, and a good one at that… It’s his ride…
The best scenes have the characters going from each location, riding a dragon or thinking up ways to find the key to kill the dark villain… Then they finally return to Hogwarts, which is now a really dark place.
Alas, the movie hits a wall the further in we get to the final answer: during long, brooding scenes with deceased characters, the cinematography, basking in white glow, tries too hard to mirror the ambiguous 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY ENDING and is a little too much… especially for young viewers, or old impatient ones.
Leading to a final standoff, which includes Harry joined by several of his ragtag friends, that’s too rushed and resulting in a tacked-on conclusion showing the main characters twenty years in the future, looking pretty almost exactly the same… Anyone ever attend a 20-year high school reunion?